Science and Gender:

Self-identification should be accepted as the primary basis for recognizing a person's gender identity, regardless of biological factors. Respecting an individual's self-defined gender experience is fundamental to their dignity and well-being. While this perspective is valid on its own, the biological sciences also provide compelling evidence that supports and enhances our understanding of gender self-identification. Furthermore, it is essential to recognize that gender is distinct from biological sex, and gender identities that do not align with assigned sex are not a new phenomenon. Various cultures have recognized multiple genders for centuries, such as the Hijra in South Asia, Two-Spirit people in many Indigenous cultures of North America, and the fa’afafine in Samoa, illustrating the longstanding diversity of gender experiences (Nanda, 1990; Jacobs et al., 1997; Besnier, 1994).

Biological sex is often thought of in binary terms—male and female—but this view is overly simplistic. There are at least five measures of biological sex, and none of them produce a strict binary. These measures include chromosomal sex (XX, XY, and variations like XXY), gonadal sex (ovaries or testes), genital sex (external genitalia), hormonal sex (balance of estrogens and androgens), and secondary sexual characteristics (features that develop during puberty). Importantly, no single measure is superior or overriding; different measures are used for different purposes in various contexts, reflecting the complexity and diversity of biological sex (Gravholt et al., 2017; Bojesen et al., 2003; Hughes, 2008; Cools et al., 2006; Speiser et al., 2010; Mongan et al., 2015; Auchus & Rainey, 2004; Hembree et al., 2017).

Neuroscientific research shows that brain structures and functions often align with an individual's experienced gender rather than their sex assigned at birth. For instance, brain imaging studies indicate that the brain patterns of transgender women (assigned male at birth) resemble those of cisgender women, and similarly for transgender men (assigned female at birth) (Guillamon et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 1995). This evidence further supports the legitimacy of self-identification.

Gender dysphoria, the distress experienced when one's gender identity does not align with their sex assigned at birth, is well-documented. Affirming gender identity through social transition, hormone therapy, and surgery significantly improves mental health outcomes for transgender individuals. Major medical organizations, such as the American Medical Association (AMA) and the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), endorse gender-affirming care as the most effective treatment for gender dysphoria (AMA, 2019; Coleman et al., 2012).

Higher rates of mental health issues among transgender individuals are largely due to societal stigma, discrimination, and lack of access to appropriate healthcare, not inherent psychological instability. Studies demonstrate that inclusive policies and supportive environments significantly reduce these mental health disparities (Meyer, 2003; Turban et al., 2020).

Public discourse around gender identity is often fraught with misinformation and misunderstanding, particularly from gender-critical theorists (or commonly referred to as TERFs—Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists) who promote a strict binary view of sex and gender. This misinformation can perpetuate harmful stereotypes and policies against transgender individuals. Therefore, it is crucial to address and correct false information whenever possible.

Gender-critical theorists often misuse scientific data to argue against transgender rights, selectively ignoring substantial evidence supporting the complexity and variability of sex and gender. They claim that gender is not real in any significant sense and reduce it strictly to biological terms, disregarding the extensive research that highlights the nuanced interplay between biology and gender identity (American Psychological Association, 2015; World Professional Association for Transgender Health, 2011).

Correcting misinformation is essential for fostering an informed and inclusive society. Individuals who feel compelled and comfortable to do so should engage in public discourse to challenge falsehoods and provide accurate information. This includes:

• Public Education: Disseminating research findings in accessible formats to help the public understand the complexities of gender identity.
• Policy Advocacy: Using scientific evidence to advocate for inclusive policies that protect transgender rights and ensure access to gender-affirming care.
• Support for Allies: Encouraging allies, including educators, healthcare providers, and policymakers, to use scientific insights to support transgender individuals and challenge misinformation.

The scientific evidence overwhelmingly supports the right of transgender individuals to self-identify and access gender-affirming care. Biological, neuroscientific, psychological, and sociocultural research all demonstrate the validity and importance of recognizing and respecting gender identity. Inclusive policies and practices not only affirm the dignity and rights of transgender individuals but also contribute to a more equitable and compassionate society.

By embracing the scientific understanding of gender, we can move towards a world that respects and affirms the identities of all individuals, ensuring their well-being and inclusion.

There are 12 memes available on this site for debunking commonly heard transphobic claims. Feel free to download and share them on your social media pages to help spread accurate information and support transgender individuals. 

1. Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. Basic Books.
2. Blackless, M., et al. (2000). How sexually dimorphic are we? Review and synthesis. American Journal of Human Biology, 12(2), 151-166.
3. Guillamon, A., Junque, C., & Gómez-Gil, E. (2016). A review of the status of brain structure research in transsexualism. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(7), 1615-1648.
4. Zhou, J. N., Hofman, M. A., Gooren, L. J., & Swaab, D. F. (1995). A sex difference in the human brain and its relation to transsexuality. Nature, 378(6552), 68-70.
5. American Medical Association. (2019). Health care needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender populations.
6. Coleman, E., et al. (2012). Standards of care for the health of transsexual, transgender, and gender-nonconforming people, version 7. International Journal of Transgenderism, 13(4), 165-232.
7. Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674-697.
8. Turban, J. L., et al. (2020). Factors leading to “detransition” among transgender and gender diverse people in the United States: A mixed-methods analysis. LGBT Health, 8(4), 273-280.
9. Nanda, S. (1990). Neither Man nor Woman: The Hijras of India. Wadsworth Publishing.
10. Jacobs, S.-E., Thomas, W., & Lang, S. (1997). Two-Spirit People: Native American Gender Identity, Sexuality, and Spirituality. University of Illinois Press.
11. Besnier, N. (1994). Polynesian Gender Liminality through Time and Space. Pacific Studies, 17(2), 3-40.
12. American Psychological Association. (2015). Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Transgender and Gender Nonconforming People.
13. World Professional Association for Transgender Health. (2011). Standards of Care for the Health of Transsexual, Transgender, and Gender-Nonconforming People.